Verse 7

For{G1063} if{G1487} that{G1565} first{G4413} [covenant] had been{G2258} faultless,{G273} then would no{G3756} {G302} place{G5117} have been sought{G2212} for a second.{G1208}

Referenced Verses

• Heb 7:11 : 11 Now if{G1487} there{G3767} was{G3303} perfection{G5050} {G2258} through{G1223} the Levitical{G3020} priesthood{G2420} (for{G1063} under{G1909} it{G846} hath the people{G2992} received the law),{G3549} what{G5101} further{G2089} need{G5532} [was there] that{G450} another{G2087} priest{G2409} should arise{G450} after{G2596} the order{G5010} of Melchizedek,{G3198} and{G2532} not{G3756} be reckoned{G3004} after{G2596} the order{G5010} of Aaron?{G2}
• Heb 7:18 : 18 For{G1063} there is{G1096} {G3303} a disannulling{G115} of a foregoing{G4254} commandment{G1785} because{G1223} of its{G846} weakness{G772} and{G2532} unprofitableness{G512}
• Heb 8:6 : 6 But{G1161} now{G3570} hath he obtained a{G5177} ministry{G3009} the more excellent,{G1313} by so much{G3745} as he is{G2076} also{G2532} the mediator{G3316} of a better{G2909} covenant,{G1242} which{G3748} hath been enacted{G3549} upon{G1909} better{G2909} promises.{G1860}
• Gal 3:21 : 21 Is the law{G3551} then{G3767} against{G2596} the promises{G1860} of God?{G3361} God forbid:{G1096} for{G1063} if{G1487} there had been{G1325} a law{G3551} given{G1325} which{G3588} could make{G1410} alive,{G2227} verily{G3689} {G302} righteousness{G1343} would have been{G2258} of{G1537} the law.{G3551}