Verse 7

For{G1063} if{G1487} that{G1565} first{G4413} covenant had been{G2258}{(G5713)} faultless{G273}, then should{G302} no{G3756} place{G5117} have been sought{G2212}{(G5712)} for the second{G1208}.

Referenced Verses

• Heb 7:11 : 11 If{G1487}{G3303} therefore{G3767} perfection{G5050} were{G2258}{(G5713)} by{G1223} the Levitical{G3020} priesthood{G2420},(for{G1063} under{G1909} it{G846} the people{G2992} received the law{G3549}{(G5718)},) what{G5101} further{G2089} need{G5532} was there that another{G2087} priest{G2409} should rise{G450}{(G5733)} after{G2596} the order{G5010} of Melchisedec{G3198}, and{G2532} not{G3756} be called{G3004}{(G5745)} after{G2596} the order{G5010} of Aaron{G2}?
• Heb 7:18 : 18 For{G1063} there is{G1096}{(G5736)} verily{G3303} a disannulling{G115} of the commandment{G1785} going before{G4254}{(G5723)} for{G1223} the weakness{G772} and{G2532} unprofitableness{G512} thereof{G846}.
• Heb 8:6 : 6 But{G1161} now{G3570} hath he obtained{G5177}{(G5758)} a more excellent{G1313} ministry{G3009}, by how much{G3745} also{G2532} he is{G2076}{(G5748)} the mediator{G3316} of a better{G2909} covenant{G1242}, which{G3748} was established{G3549}{(G5769)} upon{G1909} better{G2909} promises{G1860}.
• Gal 3:21 : 21 Is the law{G3551} then{G3767} against{G2596} the promises{G1860} of God{G2316}? God forbid{G3361}{G1096}{(G5636)}: for{G1063} if{G1487} there had been{G1325} a law{G3551} given{G1325}{(G5681)} which{G3588} could{G1410}{(G5740)} have given life{G2227}{(G5658)}, verily{G3689} righteousness{G1343} should{G302} have been{G2258}{(G5713)} by{G1537} the law{G3551}.